August 10, 2026
.png)
Where Golf's Smart Money Is Going
A look at where venture and growth capital is flowing across golf technology—and where the biggest opportunities may still be overlooked.
August 10, 2026
Matthew Erley & Evan Roosevelt, Old Tom Capital
Golf enters the back half of this decade with a level of sustained participation the industry has not seen since the height of the Tiger Woods era. According to the National Golf Foundation (NGF), U.S. golfers played roughly 549 million rounds in 2025, the sixth consecutive year above 500 million. NGF participation research also shows that women, juniors, and people of color have accounted for an increasing share of the sport's recent growth. With rounds up another 4.2% through Jun-26, the participation tailwind that has reshaped golf since 2020 continues to strengthen. Periods of sustained demand often attract investment, and golf technology has drawn increasing attention from venture and growth investors. Over the past several years, capital has flowed into businesses spanning hardware, software, agronomy, and media. What is less apparent from any single funding round or acquisition is that investment has not been distributed evenly across those categories.
This piece maps where venture and growth capital is actually landing across four areas of golf technology: launch monitors and simulators, club and course operating software, agronomy and turf-management technology, and the tools powering golf's creator economy. Looking at those categories side by side provides a clearer picture of where investment has been concentrated, where activity has remained comparatively limited, and how different parts of golf's technology ecosystem are evolving.
The Hardware Layer
Start with the category that from the outside looks like golf's most obviously venture-backed technology: launch monitors and simulators. Yet the largest transactions of the past two years tell a different story. Full Swing's sale to Bruin Capital and later to Versant, Foresight Sports' path from Vista Outdoor to Strategic Value Partners, and Sportsbox AI's athlete-led buyout were private-equity and strategic transactions rather than early-stage venture investments. That distinction helps explain where the category sits today. Capital here is increasingly acquiring established businesses rather than funding new hardware companies.
The clearest signal comes from the category's established leaders. TrackMan remains privately held, while Rapsodo's last publicly disclosed institutional funding round was a 2019 Series A. Despite becoming two of the category's most recognized brands, neither company has followed the repeated venture fundraising path common among high-growth software businesses.
That shift has redirected investment toward businesses that build recurring engagement around simulator technology rather than the hardware itself. As off-course participation has expanded, investors have increasingly backed formats that lower the barriers to entry and extend how golfers experience the game.The global golf simulator market is estimated at roughly $2.1 to $2.3 billion today and is projected to grow at a high-single-digit annual rate, according to estimates from Grand View Research and Straits Research. The National Golf Foundation estimates that another 19 million Americans now participate exclusively in off-course golf activities. Indoor golf's next phase of growth is being funded less as a hardware opportunity than as an experience business built around simulator technology.
That same shift appears across the category. TMRW Sports has turned simulator technology into the infrastructure for a broadcast product through TGL. Dryvebox packages simulator golf into a mobile franchise model, attracting backing from investors including EP Golf Ventures and TMRW Sports while partnering with brands such as Lululemon, Cobra Puma, Michelob Ultra, and Lexus. In the adjacent "Golf Lite" category, formats such as short courses, par-3 layouts, and off-course simulator venues serve a function beyond entertainment. Golf's own participation data suggests that roughly 6 million Americans try on-course golf for the first time, or return to it, each year, and that only about one in four goes on to become a regular player. Golf Lite venues are, in effect, the industry's conversion layer, lowering the barriers of time, cost, and intimidation that keep that latent demand from turning into committed play. Blue Jeans Golf, for example, is pursuing a membership-driven, technology-enabled driving-range model built on that same premise, competing for many of the same consumers without replicating Topgolf's capital-intensive footprint.
Topgolf provides a useful contrast. Callaway acquired the company at a $2 billion valuation in 2020, and by 2025 a private-equity buyer had acquired a 60 percent stake at a $1.1 billion valuation, alongside a 12 percent same-venue sales decline in the first quarter of 2025, according to Topgolf Callaway's first-quarter earnings release.. The comparison illustrates how newer entrants are pursuing lighter-weight, membership-oriented models rather than replicating Topgolf's asset-intensive approach. Different products, the same underlying theme: the hardware has largely been proven. Today's investment is increasingly flowing toward businesses built around that technology rather than the technology itself.
The Software Layer
If the hardware category reflects technologies with established demand, golf's software layer reflects a market where much of the core infrastructure is already in place. Course and club operating platforms have become well established through companies like Clubessential, now part of Xplor Technologies, Golf Genius, and GolfNow, which aggregates an estimated 90 percent of the industry's online tee-time inventory. Rather than replacing those foundational systems, recent software investment has focused on building around them.
Recent investment has instead centered on software that enhances existing golf infrastructure rather than replacing it. As the industry's core operating systems have matured, venture capital has shifted toward businesses solving more targeted problems across the golf ecosystem. Areas such as revenue management, operational intelligence, golfer engagement, and the growing digital ecosystem surrounding simulators are attracting increasing attention as operators look to improve efficiency and deliver a more connected experience. Rather than rebuilding the industry's core operating systems, these companies are addressing targeted friction points throughout the golfer journey.
Companies building across these areas illustrate how the software landscape is evolving. The next generation of software opportunity is emerging less from replacing golf's core operating systems than from extending their capabilities. As digital infrastructure becomes more established, investment is increasingly flowing toward businesses that make the ecosystem around those platforms more intelligent, connected, and valuable.
The Agronomy Layer
While hardware and software have attracted substantial investment over the past several years, agronomy represents one of the category's most underexplored opportunities. The segment addresses some of golf's largest operating costs, creating meaningful potential for technology and innovation to drive value.
Water, labor, and climate pressures are increasingly shaping the economics of course operations. An average 18-hole course can use anywhere from roughly 20 million to more than 200 million gallons of water annually, with water budgets in dry Western states routinely exceeding $1 million. At the same time, Arizona has tightened groundwater restrictions, California has imposed potable-water reduction requirements in some jurisdictions, and labor shortages remain a growing challenge. A 2025 National Golf Foundation survey found that 74 percent of courses describe hiring maintenance staff as difficult or very difficult.
That gap between operating costs and investment is not difficult to explain. Unlike media platforms or commerce businesses, agronomy technology typically creates value by reducing costs rather than generating new revenue streams, making it harder to underwrite than faster-growing software businesses. Agriculture technology remains one of venture capital's least-funded sectors, accounting for roughly 1–2% of global venture investment, according to AgFunder's Global AgriFoodTech Investment Report and PitchBook industry estimates.That leaves meaningful room for innovation and investment in golf, where many of the same operational challenges persist.
What investment does exist has largely come from strategic industry participants rather than traditional venture capital. Toro's minority investment in GreenSight Agronomics is one example. More recently, Toro partnered with TerraRad to launch Spatial Adjust, combining real-time soil-moisture mapping with automated sprinkler adjustments. The technology has already been deployed at both the 2025 Ryder Cup and the Open Championship. TerraRad's recurring software layered on top of a sensor network resembles a software business model, yet companies like it continue to attract relatively little outside funding. Independent entrants tell a similar story. SkimTurf, a satellite-based turf monitoring platform and the National Golf Course Owners Association's exclusive turf-management partner, Maya, a turf-sensor platform, and SGL Golf's TurfPod all show no disclosed outside funding.
Beyond precision irrigation, biological turf management represents another emerging area within the agronomy layer. ZymeCO recently closed a $4 million Series A to scale enzyme-based treatments that break down thatch and organic buildup in turf. While initially focused on golf, many of the underlying agronomy challenges courses face—soil health, water management, and biological turf treatments—also exist across broader turf and agricultural markets, significantly expanding the long-term addressable market for successful solutions.
That scarcity may also be the opportunity. While agronomy has attracted comparatively little venture investment, the underlying need continues to grow as courses face rising pressure from water constraints, labor shortages, and regulation. Technologies that help courses operate more efficiently could represent one of the more compelling long-term opportunities in golf technology.
The Engagement Layer
The engagement layer is the newest category on this map, but it has attracted some of golf's largest recent venture rounds. Good Good Golf's $45 million financing, led by Creator Sports Capital, marked the largest disclosed venture investment into a golf content business to date. More recently, Pro Shop and Source Golf have attracted backing from investors including Powerhouse Capital and Bolt Ventures, reflecting growing conviction behind creator-led media and commerce businesses built around the game. Taken together, these investments reflect a broader shift in how venture capital is evaluating engagement businesses. Rather than betting on participation alone, investors are increasingly backing platforms that can build scalable audiences, generate recurring engagement, and monetize attention across media, commerce, and community.
The innovation extends beyond creator-led media. Grass League, a franchise-based par-3 league that debuted in 2026, was designed for short-form content as much as live competition, doubling as a lower-barrier entry point into competitive golf, and has since partnered with Lucra to layer wagering and free-to-play gaming into the viewing experience. Fairgame, meanwhile, is building around golf's social layer through wagering, game modes, and community rather than swing analysis or performance tracking. Neither looks like a traditional golf technology company. Both reflect a broader shift toward products built around participation, entertainment, and community.
What connects these investments is not necessarily golf expertise. Creator Sports Capital and Bolt Ventures are both investment vehicles focused on the broader sports, media, and creator economies that happened to find marquee early investments in golf, part of the broader creator economy, where venture investment totaled roughly $2 billion in 2025, according to The Information's creator economy database. Audience growth, engagement, and content output are metrics that translate well across industries, making engagement-focused businesses easier for generalist investors to evaluate than more operationally complex golf technologies. As a result, the engagement layer has become one of the fastest-growing areas for outside investment in golf.
Reading the Map
A funding map is not the same as an opportunity map. The companies attracting the most investment today tend to share characteristics that venture investors know how to evaluate: recurring revenue, scalable audiences, or products with proven demand. That doesn't necessarily mean they're solving golf's biggest challenges. It reflects the types of businesses that fit the venture model.
For founders, operators, and investors, the more interesting question may not be where capital is flowing today, but where meaningful opportunities remain despite relatively little funding. In a sport as large and fragmented as golf, those two maps are unlikely to be identical.
To explore more research on emerging trends, market dynamics, and investment opportunities across the golf industry, visit the Old Tom Capital Insights page: https://www.oldtomcapital.com/insights.
Digging golf out of one of its trickiest holes.
These are grave times in golf. The world is divided with passionate opinions on both sides of a very serious and complicated issue.
The divot rule.
What did you think I was talking about?
The original 13 Rules of Golf were drafted in 1744 by The Honourable Company of Edinburgh Golfers. I have tried my hardest – admittedly, I’m not the sharpest tool in the shed – but nowhere in those 338 words do I find an instruction that if you hit the ball into a man-made crater in the fairway, you should be compelled to “play it as it lies.”
Just about everybody I’ve played with ignores the rule, rolls it out of fairway divots, then turns in their score with a clear conscience. Is everybody cheating? I don’t think so.
If a piece of the course falls into a state of disrepair, there’s a provision in the rules that it can be marked as “ground under repair” and free relief granted. In other words, if a mower goes rogue and gouges the short stuff into oblivion, it’s ok (if the blemish is acknowledged) to give the player who lands in it a drop … but if that same player just misses the sprinkler line and ends up in a crater from Uncle Cyrus’s L wedge, he’s out of luck?
“I don’t like a golfer being penalized after a good shot.” — Jack Nicklaus
Seems kind of arbitrary to me. No, let me take that back. Seems kind of stupid.
No less a figure than Jack Nicklaus agrees. “There are only a couple of rules in the game of golf that I have questioned,” he told me, “and one would be hitting a tee shot in the fairway, having it land in a sand-filled divot, and not getting relief. I don’t like a golfer being penalized after a good shot. At my Florida home club, The Bear’s Club, we allow players to take a free drop out of sand-filled divots in the fairway. It’s the fair thing to do.”
Adversity vs. Fairness
Golf has evolved to the point where we can fix spike and ball marks on the green, and that’s not all. “You can take rocks out of a bunker, you can ground your club in a hazard now. When you consider all those things, you’d have to wonder why not divots in the fairway next?” says my friend Jeff Holzschuh, who’s a member of the MGA board and who loves the game as much as anyone I know.
Funny thing, though, is that as much as all us golf-obsessed hobbyists might like to do away with the rule, the people for whom the game is a livelihood generally feel the other way.
“If you hit it in the rough, there’s no guarantee you’re going to get a bad lie,” says Stephen Cox, senior tournament director for the PGA Tour and a Rules official since 1997, “and if you hit it in the fairway, there’s no guarantee you’re going to get a good lie. Golf is a game about dealing with adversity. Things were never meant to be ‘perfect.’”
“Landing in a divot,” says David Feherty, “that’s just golf. I think the more skilled players would be universally in agreement: play it as it lies. It gives them an advantage.”
Exhibit A: The Travelers Championship
At this year’s Travelers Championship in Hartford, Sahith Theegala was tied for the lead when he hit his drive straight down the middle of the 17th fairway … and into a divot. Theegala then gouged the ball onto the green, made birdie, and took the lead. Summoning the extraordinary skill to play the hole successfully separated Theegala from the field – at least until he double-bogeyed the next hole to lose by two.
Maybe the answer is the dreaded “B” word: bifurcation. One set of rules for the pros, and another set for us provolones?
I don’t know what the answer is, but maybe in my lifetime, or that of my kids, the two sides will come together on the issue. I hope so.
Life is complicated; golf shouldn’t be. I mean, can you imagine? Something in golf that divides us like this?
It’ll never happen.
Essay originally published in The Met Golfer, August/September 2022. Special thanks to the Metropolitan Golf Association.

Become a member
*Available for a limited time only, subscribe to our twice-weekly newsletter for a discounted rate of $150 for your first year. Subscription renews at annual rate of $175 at the end of the first year.
Purchase Disclosure
By completing your purchase, you agree to enroll in an annual subscription to The Big Swing – Inside the New Golf Economy at the current rate of $150 for the first year (founding member offer). Your subscription will automatically renew annually at $175/year unless canceled prior to the renewal date.
You may cancel at any time through your account settings or by contacting customer support. All sales are final and non-refundable except where required by law.
Offer valid for a limited time and may not be combined with other promotions. Limit one per customer.
By subscribing, you agree to our Terms of Service and Subscription Terms.




.png)

